Accepted Forums 'Proof wish not to be shared' option

[Davidva]

Minecraft Username:

Davidva​

What is the suggestion about?

'Proof wish not to be shared' option​

Description:

My suggestion is to remove the button 'proof wish not to be shared'. Especially for bans it's good to know wherefore you're banned. How are you supposed to write a proper appeal without knowing what exactly got you banned.​

​

Not to be disrespectful to any staff member but I believe some really lack knowledge about the workings of hacks, reach and connection. If a staff member makes a wrong decision by accepting proof of a legitimate player some experienced players and ex staff can review it aswell and see a mistake.​

​

We are a community and we should work together to avoid mistakes like banning known players falsely.​

​

​

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?

Less permanent false bans​

 

[Deleted member 43343]

Nah that's not how it should work I went through that situation myself I was false banned but luckily I got unbanned the same day as they looked more into the evidence and I haven't even seen the evidence till this day, So some other people might get false banned and never try to prove them wrong because they never saw the evidence.

I don't care, staff should be more careful. I stand by the point that evidence, if chosen to be hidden, remains hidden.

Just upload on another YouTube channel with a random name. That is the easy solution

You can find out their identity by the contents of their screen, not just their YouTube channel.

That doesn't remove your name from the video. That was some dumb statement.

This.

+1. Please. Just Please.

NO.

 

[Almostlikeaboss]

Just accepted it already

 

[Davidva]

By showing the evidence, you could reveal the identity of a reporting user. Therefore, I am strongly against showing evidence, this should only be shown to staff members. You know god damn well why you got banned if you get banned.

That's not true. If I get banned for reach I want to see the damn proof. Staff can make mistakes. It happend before.

 

[Jitterinq]

That's not true. If I get banned for reach I want to see the damn proof. Staff can make mistakes. It happend before.

Agreed

 

[Slash]

accept already

 

[YWNightmare]

+1
Yes, I got wrongly banned twice and the second time I couldn't even know why since the proofs were "requested not to be shared". I had to work it out via previous hackaccusations and video proofs based on just foreboding. T

 

[ExpertAQ]

But, one thing, what if the reporter removes the evidence after the ban? The thing remains pretty much the same.

I'm still up with this suggestion though.

 

[NotLoLo1818]

But, one thing, what if the reporter removes the evidence after the ban? The thing remains pretty much the same.

I'm still up with this suggestion though.

That's not allowed then the player gets unbanned.

 

[Xaycent]

+1 For now,
Awesome idea.

 

[JohnMak]

A permanently banned player wanna see the reason and the proof why he/she got banned, I think he/she has the right.
+1