Accepted Forums 'Proof wish not to be shared' option

[Davidva]

Minecraft Username:

Davidva​

What is the suggestion about?

'Proof wish not to be shared' option​

Description:

My suggestion is to remove the button 'proof wish not to be shared'. Especially for bans it's good to know wherefore you're banned. How are you supposed to write a proper appeal without knowing what exactly got you banned.​

​

Not to be disrespectful to any staff member but I believe some really lack knowledge about the workings of hacks, reach and connection. If a staff member makes a wrong decision by accepting proof of a legitimate player some experienced players and ex staff can review it aswell and see a mistake.​

​

We are a community and we should work together to avoid mistakes like banning known players falsely.​

​

​

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?

Less permanent false bans​

 

[Knowly]

+1

 

[JoltTheBolt]

+1

 

[Arrydzn]

+1

 

[Just_A_Builduuur]

I think that the main reason behind 'proof requested not to be shared' was supposed to be a way to protect the reporter in case the muted/banned player will start sending threat messages to the reporter and/or find a way to revenge and(maybe) harm the reporter in real life, they(the reporters) don't know if the player that got banned/muted has the power to do such stuff, and that's why I think that any reporter who chose not to share the proof is just scared of the consequences

Your suggestion made me think about an idea:

Adding one more section if you choose not to share it, the new section will ask you 'why do you wish to not share the proof?' the new section will be a big text box below the question that will let the player explain why he/she chose not to share the proof
Any staff member that will review the report will decide(based on the reason) if to post the proof on the ban/mute or not


Anyways, if I'm wrong or not about the main reason behind it, I'm still going with +1 because I agree with you, I would like to see them removing it and see how it goes

 

[unlqvinly]

Why don't like if they want the proof, they can ask the person that reported him or staff that ban him for proof? But the staff must ask the person that reported him for permission first.

 

[Kiito]

Why don't like if they want the proof, they can ask the person that reported him or staff that ban him for proof? But the staff must ask the person that reported him for permission first.

Isn't that literally how reports work??? they ask you if you've given them permission to share the video, meaning including the video evidence in the ban reason, have you ever reported anyone before you even applied?

 

[unlqvinly]

Isn't that literally how reports work??? they ask you if you've given them permission to share the video, meaning including the video evidence in the ban reason, have you ever reported anyone before you even applied?

I didn't make sense lol, and I've reported people before

 

[montearchie]

+1

 

[Deleted member 43343]

-1. By making a report, you can choose to keep evidence anonymous. By not allowing users anonymity from the user who they're reporting, you're giving off the hint that "Hey, I will be known as a snitch" for making a report.

 

[Kiito]

I think that the main reason behind 'proof requested not to be shared' was supposed to be a way to protect the reporter in case the muted/banned player will start sending threat messages to the reporter and/or find a way to revenge and(maybe) harm the reporter in real life, they(the reporters) don't know if the player that got banned/muted has the power to do such stuff, and that's why I think that any reporter who chose not to share the proof is just scared of the consequences

Your suggestion made me think about an idea:

Adding one more section if you choose not to share it, the new section will ask you 'why do you wish to not share the proof?' the new section will be a big text box below the question that will let the player explain why he/she chose not to share the proof
Any staff member that will review the report will decide(based on the reason) if to post the proof on the ban/mute or not


Anyways, if I'm wrong or not about the main reason behind it, I'm still going with +1 because I agree with you, I would like to see them removing it and see how it goes

Agreed, they have to give a fair reason as to why it shouldn't be shared