votetop

[AsianGod]

I realized that last month on votetop, 2 people had the same votes (samran and aizzble) yet aizzble got less gold than samran for no odd reason. They should've got the same amount of gold placing both of them as 2nd place. This is unfair to aizzble and I wouldn't like this to happen this month.

I have been top voter for a significant amount of this month and always vote first to become votetop.



If me and 1ag and Associatives get the same votes, we all deserve the same amount of gold as 1st place. Same as if 2 people get the same votes for 2nd place, they both get the same amount of gold for 2nd place rewards

 

[daviddaraban]

Well you could create a suggestion asking for a randomizer to be used next time

Or give the same prize to both but that is with the manager i guess, as i stated up randomizer with a video that is used as proof would be ok

In my opinion the same 2 people should get the same prize or they should provide a video with they putin a randomizer wheel from google that picks 1 and he gets the prize.

 

[AsianGod]

Well you could create a suggestion asking for a randomizer to be used next time

But I don't want it to be randomized, I want equal same rewards for the same votes.

 

[daviddaraban]

I believe the first letter of your name matters on what position you're gonna get

That wouldnt be ok, all people would use a acc with a character in front or the leter "a" so they can get vote top everytime

 

[_Rinat_]

That wouldnt be ok, all people would use a acc with a character in front or the leter "a" so they can get vote top everytime

yeah ok it doesn't work like that i'm dumb, I think it's just who gets the votes faster

 

[daviddaraban]

yeah ok it doesn't work like that i'm dumb, I think it's just who gets the votes faster

Hmm that would be ok but since both got same ammount of votes, prob both should get same ammount of reward

 

[AsianGod]

yeah ok it doesn't work like that i'm dumb, I think it's just who gets the votes faster

did u not see the video i sent in the other comment? it shows its not up to who gets it faster

 

[daviddaraban]

Gunfire claims that it matters on how fast someone votes is dependent on 1st and 2nd place. But this video shows this is incorrect. https://streamable.com/ggrd73

well according to this video evidence i think that if all people have 1 only vote to make then the last one will be the first (1st) place on vote top. Am i right? cause it will update ur vote and put u on top and so on

 

[AsianGod]

well according to this video evidence i think that if all people have 1 only vote to make then the last one will be the first (1st) place on vote top. Am i right? cause it will update ur vote and put u on top and so on

thats not how it works. 1ag always gets higher even if i vote faster than him and we have the same votes. its stupid randomizing which doesnt have any factor in voting.

 

[Norking]

This should never happens since getting on top with same votes has a specific technique that only few know about it . I am sure 1ag knows about it and that's how he get on top even with same votes , I was also using such technique to get votetop #1 in past. Same prize for same votes should never implemented just because u don't know how , does not mean it does not exist.


Just for your info , this video does not prove anything cause the concept is not even close to the actual system.

 

[AsianGod]

This should never happens since getting on top with same votes has a specific technique that only few know about it . I am sure 1ag knows about it and that's how he get on top even with same votes , I was also using such technique to get votetop #1 in past. Same prize for same votes should never implemented just because u don't know how , does not mean it does not exist.


Just for your info , this video does not prove anything cause the concept is not even close to the actual system.

1ag was the one who submitted the video and encouraged me to post the report. so its clear u dont have any actual evidence or proof that the system is actually like the way your saying. and however way u think it is, they should either make it on who votes the fastest, or just give same rewards for same votes. anything else doesnt make any sense to me. so if u could actually explain what your talking about and back it up with evidence, ill see to ur point.