Accepted Forums 'Proof wish not to be shared' option

[Davidva]

Minecraft Username:

Davidva​

What is the suggestion about?

'Proof wish not to be shared' option​

Description:

My suggestion is to remove the button 'proof wish not to be shared'. Especially for bans it's good to know wherefore you're banned. How are you supposed to write a proper appeal without knowing what exactly got you banned.​

​

Not to be disrespectful to any staff member but I believe some really lack knowledge about the workings of hacks, reach and connection. If a staff member makes a wrong decision by accepting proof of a legitimate player some experienced players and ex staff can review it aswell and see a mistake.​

​

We are a community and we should work together to avoid mistakes like banning known players falsely.​

​

​

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?

Less permanent false bans​

 

[Redorian]

or you could simply provide the proof but not tell who reported if that hasn't already been said

 

[NotLoLo1818]

I talk whenever I want, understood? Fuck you and your miserable shit life.

Miserable shit life? LOL, At least I don't wanna fuck a underage while being 18+ years 'Miserable life'

 

[DROGON623]

-1 nah i simply disagree, made a mistake of sharing proof on a ban abd then the guy faked proof and gkt me banned so no, i simply disagree to removing it

 

[ExpertAQ]

-1 nah i simply disagree, made a mistake of sharing proof on a ban abd then the guy faked proof and gkt me banned so no, i simply disagree to removing it

Oho, how did you know if he was same guy whom you reported? More like trying to hide that you actually tried to exploit map.

Edit: I just analysed everything and come to conclusion that your just lying just to make your point. Stop.

 

[DROGON623]

Oho, how did you know if he was same guy whom you reported? More like trying to hide that you actually tried to exploit map.

Edit: I just analysed everything and come to conclusion that your just lying just to make your point. Stop.

what were u saying?

 

[Deleted member 43343]

You're talking about a whole different thing now

You didn't pick it up correctly the first time I said it.

 

[Davidva]

You didn't pick it up correctly the first time I said it.

Because you were bitching about something else for 20 posts before that

 

[ExpertAQ]

what were u saying?

You missed the whole point. How do you know if it was the same player who you reported/banned? I'm not here to talk whether proof was fake or not

Moreover, When you were banned, proof was requested not to be shared, otherwise you would not have faced such situation. And if this suggestion had been accepted earlier, you would not have talked to Voxl in first place. So why are you voting -1?

 

[DROGON623]

You missed the whole point. How do you know if it was the same player who you reported/banned? I'm not here to talk whether proof was fake or not

Moreover, When you were banned, proof was requested not to be shared, otherwise you would not have faced such situation. And if this suggestion had been accepted earlier, you would not have talked to Voxl in first place. So why are you voting -1?

I know it was the same guy because of the fact that I got him banned later and he also admitted some of his 'other' mates who were also banned because of what I did, decided to fake proof. So if I hadnt shared proof in the first place nothing would have happened.

 

[ExpertAQ]

I know it was the same guy because of the fact that I got him banned later and he also admitted some of his 'other' mates who were also banned because of what I did, decided to fake proof. So if I hadnt shared proof in the first place nothing would have happened.

Can be said in both ways. If rule was scraped, you wouldn't have to ask Voxl. But if it wasn't, you would have decided not to share the proof.

But mostly these cases are rare to happen. It might had happened to you but nevertheless, you're successfully unbanned in few days. I cant imagine someone wasting hours to fake proof only to get someone banned for a day.