ItzCJC
Member
- Joined
- February 24, 2018
- Messages
- 86
- Points
- 24
SUGGESTION UPDATED
30/4/2018 AT 7:10AM (UTC)
30/4/2018 AT 7:10AM (UTC)
===============================================================================================
Minecraft Username:
CJC
What is your suggestion about?
About Forums Ranks
What section is this suggestion for?
Website, Discord
Describe your suggestion:
Since there is a "Great Reporter" forum rank, that makes me thought of this suggestion.
This suggestion is about great viewers on applications or calls the "Great App Checker".
About "Great App Checker" Forum Rank
This rank shows how you know more about applications in Jartex, giving ratings that are suitable and suggesting the newbies on why we give those specific ratings to their application. With this, people especially newbies will identify more about how an application works. It will help on people who want to create an app to make a successful and a higher chance of being accepted.
There are some strict rules to be able to work.
> They must follow a new format made by their own.
> No plagiarism, all voters with reasons stated must watch out for this.
> They must have 100 apps with reason and "Agreed, -1." to get this rank.
> They must state their own reasons to get this Great App Checker rank too.
*More information on both reasons can be found on the first suggestion's spoiler.
How could this help to improve Jartex Network?This suggestion is about great viewers on applications or calls the "Great App Checker".
About "Great App Checker" Forum Rank
This rank shows how you know more about applications in Jartex, giving ratings that are suitable and suggesting the newbies on why we give those specific ratings to their application. With this, people especially newbies will identify more about how an application works. It will help on people who want to create an app to make a successful and a higher chance of being accepted.
There are some strict rules to be able to work.
> They must follow a new format made by their own.
A new person make this format and follow that.
===========================================================
I have decided to vote (+1/-1) due to:
===========================================================
If they did similar to this, it's still fine.
But if they didn't follow what they write,
there will be no Great App Checker rank for the person.
===========================================================
I have decided to vote (+1/-1) due to:
- Reason 1
- Reason 2
- And so on if having more than 2 reasons.
===========================================================
If they did similar to this, it's still fine.
But if they didn't follow what they write,
there will be no Great App Checker rank for the person.
> No plagiarism, all voters with reasons stated must watch out for this.
Notices!
If some plagiarises other people's feedback, they can reply to it by saying that he did plagiarise it.
If some plagiarises other people's feedback, they can reply to it by saying that he did plagiarise it.
> They must have 100 apps with reason and "Agreed, -1." to get this rank.
> They must state their own reasons to get this Great App Checker rank too.
*More information on both reasons can be found on the first suggestion's spoiler.
This will let people know more about applications on Jartex and how to improve on their application.
Is there anything else we should know?
You guys might not know me.
What attracts me is the trial application.
From here, I could learn more about applications.
More than that, I would like to see this suggestion to be added to Jartex.
I was about to post another forums rank but it's not really that appealing.
It's about "Great Suggester".
If you think that forums rank is a good idea, let me know and I will edit this post to add that too.
Thanks for reading this suggestion, much appreciated.
What attracts me is the trial application.
From here, I could learn more about applications.
More than that, I would like to see this suggestion to be added to Jartex.
I was about to post another forums rank but it's not really that appealing.
It's about "Great Suggester".
If you think that forums rank is a good idea, let me know and I will edit this post to add that too.
Thanks for reading this suggestion, much appreciated.
Last edited:
