Denied Trial Age Req.

[Yanique1]

Minecraft Username:

Yanique1​

What is the suggestion about?

Trial Age Req.​

Description:

Currently the trial application states that people are preferred to be 14 years old before they apply, but since Jartex Discord is following the Discord TOS, this means users can’t be under 13 years old. So, I suggest changing the age from preferably 14 to a required 13.​

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?

People won’t apply if they are underage and this won’t lead to as many complications in the staff team​

Who can make this change happen?!

Rodagave115

 

[xTappinq]

+1 maybe even 15+ so you get mature staff

 

[Yanique1]

Make it required 14 then lmao. If it was me i'd making it 16+. You get all the mfs who dont give a shit about their future

sure i’m just saying add an age requirement on its own

 

[LucrativeGX561]

Minecraft Username:

Yanique1​

What is the suggestion about?

Trial Age Req.​

Description:

Currently the trial application states that people are preferred to be 14 years old before they apply, but since Jartex Discord is following the Discord TOS, this means users can’t be under 13 years old. So, I suggest changing the age from preferably 14 to a required 13.​

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?

People won’t apply if they are underage and this won’t lead to as many complications in the staff team​

Who can make this change happen?!

Rodagave115

Neutral cause there is simply little to no difference by being 1 year old younger/older.

 

[Yanique1]

Neutral cause there is simply little to no difference by being 1 year old younger/older.

I guess i’m not making myself clear… THERE IS NO AGE LIMIT RIGHT NOW the management team just prefers those who are 14 years old, i’m suggesting to add an age requirement for atleast 13 years old (could be higher) since the discord TOS states you must be atleast 13 to use discord…

 

[maulik1112]

I remember asking jolt once and he said minimum age requirement is 14 and 13 is only acceptable when you're extremely mature. 14 is a requirement itself but it's not mentioned clearly.

 

[Yanique1]

I remember asking jolt once and he said minimum age requirement is 14 and 13 is only acceptable when you're extremely mature. 14 is a requirement itself but it's not mentioned clearly.

there have been staff who were 11-12 years old i’m pretty sure. But again i’m suggesting to make the age requirement more clear so yea

 

[Heroic]

+1 ∷⠀I personally like the staffs to be 15+, but still, upvoted for this reason:

People won’t apply if they are underage and this won’t lead to as many complications in the staff team

 

[MrBeastAlan]

Uhh Neutral Reasons stated by community

 

[Nirahz]

that's dumb, if it's to combat people getting termed for tos, then you should suggest the people who handle applications should pay closer attention to age and country of origin. i agree on changing the requirements, primarily so we can actually get a functioning staff team here, but this seems a little weird.

 

[rLilJesus]

It is not a big deal to change the requirement, people under the age of 13 will apply regardless, and if they are fit for it they will be accepted. I do agree with Nirahz that we should pay more attention in the future to the age restrictions.