Denied Minigames Talents

[unlqvinly]

Minecraft Username:

ItzCqldFxld​

What is your suggestion's title?

Talents​

Suggestion Details:

Due to their being clan rewards that give a lot of coins being at certain top 50. Talents can be max out easily and coins would be render useless for a while till there is stuff to spend on. So what I am suggesting is to have a prestige type of talents. For say I have max out diamond, to prestige it, it would cost 100k - 200k counts, and to prestige it again, the talent would need to be max out again which would cost more coins. This may seem overpower but it at least would render the coins useful.​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?

More coins to spend, more grind and clan rewards would be useful.​

 

[Stxrs]

To be honest this would kind of become unfair as there are very over powered talents in both skywars and bedwars

 

[FuzniX]

To be honest this would kind of become unfair as there are very over powered talents in both skywars and bedwars

As I already said it yes, would be too op

 

[WildAbbee]

Hello!
After reviewing your suggestion, I decided to downvote your suggestion because I think some talents are very op and don't need to be more op than they already are.
I take the Strength in Skywars to take an example, it already permits to almost one hit someone and I don't think it's should be more op than that. -1

also -1 for these reasons. coins do need a use but a very small percentage of the playerbase has 3 tier 8 talents, and even less have every talent at tier 8

 

[Empity0]

I first gave it +1 but if new players join it will be too op on them so im gonna give it a down vote

 

[Mack]

Suggestion - Downvote (-1)

Hey unlqvinly,

I decided to give your Suggestion “Talents” a Downvote (-1) due to the following Reason(s).

• too op


Goodluck!

 

[stupxd]

Suggestion - DENIED

​

Hello, unlqvinly​

Thank you for your interest in JartexNetwork by creating a suggestion for the network. After reviewing your suggestion, I have decided to deny it for the following reason(s);​

• Not a good suggestion.

Have fun playing on JartexNetwork!​

Kind Regards,​

~ stupxd​