Denied SS'ing and freezing people.

[dasjoms]

Minecraft Username:

dasjoms​

What is the suggestion about?

SS'ing and freezing people.​

Description:

There should be a pop up, which shows up 3 items.

https://imgur.com/a/HgzNQWN

View: https://imgur.com/a/HgzNQWN
(made by dasjoms so no copyright stuff)​

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?

It would save a lot of time before ssing and adding those people(to discord) and also it would give some players some time to think about their punishment etc. Permanent punishment will only make players appeal and thats it.. which doesn't help a lot.


(1.punishment could be 15d and the next punishment even more.)​

Extra Information:

That's all. It's not something big but it could help somewhere.​

 

[MerhusDagon]

Interesting idea, if its added, the ban should be 30 days, since a ss ban is permanent.

 

[Moritc]

Probably make it 1 month Netural

 

[MoudTage_]

I like the context of this, the rules what's so ever can be flexible as the rules we have in Team screen share are different from the ones stated here.
However I like the GUI Idea, Upvoted.

 

[Im_Stuart]

+1 i like the idea, will make jartex cleaner

 

[Moritc]

dasjoms i was thinking about this Idea but i'm not really sure because if u did get 30 day ban Hacker's can hack more

 

[dasjoms]

i was thinking about this Idea

Why didn't you suggest yet?
Also it's about ss'ing people. Staff only ss's people who are kinda suspected about their history (sending to many packages of any kind of cheat)
This has nothing to do of banning some random hardcore obvious cheaters.
I was talking about 'undercover' cheaters who use ghostclients/ autoclickers etc.

Also yes. 30 days of ban would be better. Agreed +1

 

[Moritc]

Why didn't you suggest yet?
Also it's about ss'ing people. Staff only ss's people who are kinda suspected about their history (sending to many packages of any kind of cheat)
This has nothing to do of banning some random hardcore obvious cheaters.
I was talking about 'undercover' cheaters who use ghostclients/ autoclickers etc.

Also yes. 30 days of ban would be better. Agreed +1

Oh ok Then yes but like if they were using Like Hacked Client then Perma man i think

 

[Alex]

+1 but there should also be a message "are you sure this is your answer".

 

[mmmDoughnutzzz]

Definitely unique, if i was in that situation i would definitely feel ALOT less encouraged to cheat, so +1