Menu

Learn how to start playing on JartexNetwork in just 60 seconds!
Play Now
Learn how to join our server
and start playing in 60 seconds
Play Now
CLICK TO JOIN JOIN OUR DISCORD
0
0

Denied Re-enable disguise options in creative

Status
Not open for further replies.

bbbbbb

Addicted Member
Great Reporter
Donator
Team Events Builder
Joined
August 14, 2017
Messages
1,113
Points
112
Age
18
IGN
bbbbbbb
Minecraft Username:
bbbbbbb​

What is your suggestion's title?
Re-enable disguise options in creative​

Suggestion Details:
Please re-enable disguise options in creative. The options offer a diversity of customisations to the standard disguise type and offer a ton of fun for disguises as it allows us to be creative with what we turn into, such as:​
A burning and glowing vertical horse carrying a chest with it's mouth open,​
Or,​
A primed TNT with a red name tag in bold: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.​
For many donators, this is the FUN part of the disguise plugin, we are grateful for the many new disguises added to creative and /trails being finally fixed, but i think the options being removed take away a huge part of the allure of the disguises feature and can turn away potential donators from buying their ranks when they find out from existing donators that every disguise option (except for setBlock for falling block) is locked.​
Hence, i suggest for ALL disguises options to be enabled in creative, except for:​
AREA_EFFECT_CLOUD​
setRadius (can be abused to cause a lot of lag)​
SLIME, PHANTOM​
setSize (it's only use is for trolling)​
GLOBAL​
setInvisible (why have a disguise if others cant see it?)​
And certain disguise options to be enabled alongside rules that will be enforced if donators abuse them​
Player/Staff Impersonation​
-PLAYER​
--setName​
--setDisplayedInTab​
GLOBAL​
-setCustomName​
-setCustomNameVisible​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?
For those looking at this suggestion, please take a look at this:​
I think the "disguise options were never intended in the first place" argument does not make sense; If they were never intended, they would not have been available in the first place. Jartex needs to listen to what the playerbase wants, what the donators PAID for, and not just fix some small issues by disabling almost every single option. This is by far the dumbest change I have ever seen in JN Creative, which i have been a loyal player of, since mid 2016.​
Accepting this suggestion will be a good change for JartexNetwork as it will show that the server cares about the playerbase, and can help in alleviating Jartex's imfamous reputation of money being the only thing the server cares about.​

Extra Information:
To even further make sure that this suggestion is in line with what the playerbase wants, I had interviewed some donators in creative and compiled a list of their thoughts about the disguise features being removed.​
Please take a look at what the ranked players have to say about the removal of disguise options if the above isnt enough to convince yall to add disguise options back.​
(Architect) Hannah_Eilish: "we wanted to get it back bc it's more fun"​
(Architect) aiikori :"Mhh i dont know what to say tbh, but i think those commands make the disguises funnier"​
(Architect) naranbaatr :"bad"​
(Creator) clodverse_ :"i think its good we have new disguises but i don't think it was good taking out all the options"​
(Creator) IceyJewel :"terrible because then it will be less fun and it wont really be for rp"​
(Creator) dismal :"the options were what made /d fun and customisable, i miss them and want them back"​
(Creator) 19Z :"ig without it it will be boring"​
(Creator) _4sh :"nono is cool to have them back so lets try to put them back-"​
(Designer) Roseey_ :"yes add them back."​
(Architect) Yunhyeong: *wants disguise options added back too because Roseey_ does*​
This is what the paying players want, and a big part of what the paying players paid for. I'd even compare the removal of disguise options to scamming us of our money, which is very ironic given that scamming is apparently a rule in creative. Yall really be breaking your own rules smh.​
That said, i dont see a reason why this suggestion should be denied, and i have put in a lot of effort into writing everything out too. If denied, there better be a very good reason for it instead of the standard template without any reasons:​
Suggestion - DENIED​
Hello, bbbbbb​
Thank you for your interest in JartexNetwork by creating a suggestion for the network. After reviewing your suggestion, I have decided to deny it.​
Have fun playing on JartexNetwork!​
Kind Regards,​
(username)​
As always i cant stress enough that the past few updates and fixes on creative has been really amazing and i want to thank Rodagave115 Rodagave115 for all the hard work on the creative server. I might have been a little harsh in the suggestion so apologies in advance for that, but i see a very big missed opportunity to make creative much more fun, in the disguise options being removed. Please.​
Edit 1: added another player's opinion to the list​
 
Last edited:

VoidX

Addicted Member
Joined
July 2, 2021
Messages
285
Points
61
Neutral


Hello

I'll be staying Neutral due to the following reason(s):
  • Unsure
 

Rodagave115

Manager
Staff member
Manager
Joined
January 28, 2019
Messages
8,221
Points
369
Suggestion - DENIED
Hello, bbbbbb​
Thank you for your interest in JartexNetwork by creating a suggestion for the network. After reviewing your suggestion, I have decided to deny it.​
Have fun playing on JartexNetwork!​

Kind Regards,​
~ Rodagave
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top