Menu

Learn how to start playing on JartexNetwork in just 60 seconds!
Play Now
Learn how to join our server
and start playing in 60 seconds
Play Now
CLICK TO JOIN JOIN OUR DISCORD
0
0

Accepted Immortal Factions Ally Patching Rules

Status
Not open for further replies.

_Vault_Tec

Active Member
Joined
January 12, 2018
Messages
98
Points
32
Minecraft Username:
_Vault_Tec

What is the suggestion about?
Ally Patching Rules

Description:
Over the course of the current map I have been seeing a lot of factions ally with each other and then patch for each other. In some serious cases people have been allying with 3-4 factions and doing this. Ultimately, this makes it literally impossible to force raid anyone when you have a plethora of players patching. Nearly all faction servers never allow allies to patch for each other and rarely even allow alliances to occur, I do believe jartex should keep its alliances but more rules should be enforced on patching for each other. The main example I want to give for this map was the Alliance of Jihad and Split (These 2 factions also ended up allying other factions during the map but I will get onto that later.) They checked each others walls all map and had full permissions to edit in the territory of each other, this lead to them patching for each other and stopping most raids due to their remarkable amount of numbers combined. When PokemonGo or HahaXD rolled around and joined in on the alliance it made it almost impossible to raid any of them when they had 4 factions checking their walls and patching for them. This lead to a kill of my faction as everyone gave up since we were on our own at that time and didn't have any allies to help us.
Now this brings us to today, Jihad is f top 1, Split is f top 2 and PokemonGo is f top 3. Can you guess how they got unraided?

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?
This idea would help jartex like no other. This would make jartex factions a lot more competitive as it would only be 1 faction raiding and 1 faction defending instead of 1 faction raiding and 4 factions defending. This idea would make it a lot fairer for smaller factions as well since they would stand a greater chance of raiding bigger factions. If this idea was implemented then we would see a sudden change of next map as a lot of older players would come back. There would also be a lot more raiding going on since it would actually be worth trying. (I have full intentions of not playing jartex next map if the alliance rules are not changed because its not even worth trying to raid anymore.)

Extra Information:
I do not think allying should be removed from jartex, I just believe rules should be enforced on allies patching for each other.
 

starjr

Donator
Donator
Joined
February 26, 2019
Messages
553
Points
66
Age
18
IGN
starjr
Allies can help each other in pvp? But not in patching for each other.
Can you guys legit fucking read my points before making stupid comments? Thanks
PvP in what? while raiding? or just like in warp fps? cuz in warp fps theres no point of needing to ally with fac. If it's in raiding then that's not fair either. 2 factions can raid 1. Obviously the one alone can have another faction help then.
 
AUTHOR
AUTHOR
_Vault_Tec

_Vault_Tec

Active Member
Joined
January 12, 2018
Messages
98
Points
32
PvP in what? while raiding? or just like in warp fps? cuz in warp fps theres no point of needing to ally with fac. If it's in raiding then that's not fair either. 2 factions can raid 1. Obviously the one alone can have another faction help then.
Your really not making any sense. You don't play faction, fuck off.
 

DROGON623

Great Reporter
Great Reporter
Donator
Joined
October 30, 2018
Messages
1,317
Points
146
-1 it is impossible to add what u are saying, its like even if they didnt ally they can stil check on each others bases and tell them when they are getting raided? i mean there will always be loopholes.
 

shayan787

Member
Joined
October 15, 2019
Messages
10
Points
5
Age
18
Ok first off, we raided PokemonGo when they didn't have any allies.
We got 40 walls into split because it was a half offline raid.
We breached both of Jihads counters because everyone was OFFLINE.
My point is that FORCE raiding is impossible when you have a lot of allies patching for you.
yes
 
AUTHOR
AUTHOR
_Vault_Tec

_Vault_Tec

Active Member
Joined
January 12, 2018
Messages
98
Points
32
-1 it is impossible to add what u are saying, its like even if they didnt ally they can stil check on each others bases and tell them when they are getting raided? i mean there will always be loopholes.
Please read my suggestion before commenting dumb shit, I only care about allies patching for each other.
 

_AT_

Member
Joined
August 31, 2018
Messages
69
Points
17
Tbh, i wasn't active in this season. I didn't play that map. Call me a reject, or whatever bs you want. But what i did see, was UNFAIR. Of course, im not going against any of you guys, who ally, or you vault. Targetting one faction, by making so many alliances , is literally cowardish, if thats a word. Example, you are alone and get to fight with 1 guy, but that guy calls 2-3 more peep to help him, isn't that guy enough coward to fight you face-to-face? I must say, yes. That's what I think happened this map. But I might be mistaken, correct me so. Jartex should keep alliances, but have a TRUE LIMIT. What do I mean, if max allies are 2, THOSE 2 ONLY should help each other. If it's seen that a bigger alliance is made, it should be punished. Just my opinion, no hate pls.
 

_AT_

Member
Joined
August 31, 2018
Messages
69
Points
17
Also, +1.
I don't care at all how many allies jartex should have, at least there is a limit in it.
Max 4? IF 5, PUNISHED.
No exceptions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top