Lobby KitPvP TheBridge Minigames Addition Of a system to review hackers in game and classify it as sufficient or insufficient evidence.

[T3RRAGL1DER]

Minecraft Username:

Terraglider​

What is your suggestion's title?

Addition Of a system to review hackers in game and classify it as sufficient or insufficient evidence.​

Suggestion Details:

This is a system that it already existent in hypixel, /atlas. This system allows players to spectate an already prerecorded game with 1 or more hackers in game and then classify whether the evidence was true or was false. When a certain person gets enough correct answers if a person is hacking or not they would receive a trusted reviewer or any other rank like that and the votes that are given by them can be trusted most of the times. The reviewing system should mainly be a majority system.​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?

This method could make the process of checking whether a person is hacking or not much easier as the staff can review the ones with a higher number of vote that says the player is hacking and review it easily and ones with more the player is not hacking votes could be identified a sthe player is not hacking making it easier for staff.​

Extra Information:

This idea can be changed according to the will of the staff but this addition will greatly ease the tension off staff and make it a server that is being helped by both players and staff equally.​

 

[DakshWagh]

+1

 

[Technoblade7766]

+1

 

[Menzey]

Seems good! +1!

 

[Stjernestorm]

+1