Denied Adding a new rule: Chaining

[Lumin0us]

Minecraft Username:

Lolguy376​

What is the suggestion about?

Adding a new rule: Chaining​

Description:

So let me explain: Chaining is when multiple people repeat same message that the first person sent over and over again​

​

Here are some examples of what does chaining look like:​

https://imgur.com/25vwUkg

​

View: https://imgur.com/25vwUkg​

​

https://imgur.com/R2M1YHR

​

View: https://imgur.com/R2M1YHR

https://imgur.com/nFdxjib

View: https://imgur.com/nFdxjib
​

note: this is not considered rioting as there is nothing riotable in it

​

​

If the person(s) sends that same message more than 3 times, the user should be punished because it causes flooding and spam in donators or any other channel​

​

Offenses for the rule:​

First offense ⇾ Warning​

Second offense ⇾ 1 hour mute​

Third offense ⇾ 1 Day mute​

Fourth Offense ⇾ 2 Day mute​

​

1d+ ban for each next offense​

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?

This will be useful and there will be less amount of people flooding/chaining/spamming in donators/main chat​

Extra Information:

This suggestion might be edited multiple times in future!​

And please do not downvote it just because you simply want to flood channels by chaining or any other shitty reasons relating to rioting​

As nothing relating to math (examples) is rioting​

 

[Vittorio]

+1
Would be useful to prevent people from flooding/chaining chats

 

[not_Nuggets]

This counts as "Rioting". So making a rule like this would be useless

 

[Lumin0us]

This counts as "Rioting". So making a rule like this would be useless

isnt putting for example #unbanahmede as rioting? they didnt even riot, they just copied and pasted then sent someone elses message

 

[not_Nuggets]

it does count as rioting. We let some instances in Donators chat slide, but yes it would be classified as Rioting

 

[Jesse531]

-1 It is considered "Rioting". (Heres your 6 words )

 

[Lumin0us]

Atleast people didnt downvote it because they want to flood
But hey, thanks for the feedback atleast

 

[Jesse531]

Atleast people didnt downvote it because they want to flood
But hey, thanks for the feedback atleast

Yeah, np. Good luck with your suggestion.

 

[SquareWings928]

Dear Lolguy376, thank you for taking the time to make a suggestion for JartexNetwork. After reviewing your suggestion I have decided to give it a -1 for the following reasons:

• As nuggets said what the players are doing in this screenshot is considered rioting and it would make no sense to create another rule.

Square

 

[Lumin0us]

Report - DENIED

Hello, Lolguy376​

Thank you for your interest in helping JartexNetwork by keeping the server clean of rule breakers. I have reviewed the evidence(s) provided by you, and I have decided to deny the report. This decision has been taken due to the following reason(s):​

• As nuggets said what the players are doing in this screenshot is considered rioting and it would make no sense to create another rule.

For your reference, here is the link to our server rules ➟ JN RULES.​

Have fun playing on JartexNetwork!​

Kind Regards,​

~ SquareWings928​

caught and replied in 4k man, this aint a report