Menu

Learn how to start playing on JartexNetwork in just 60 seconds!
Play Now
Learn how to join our server
and start playing in 60 seconds
Play Now
CLICK TO JOIN JOIN OUR DISCORD
0
0

Denied TheBridge A simple but risky way to remove hackers (Voting)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
November 9, 2020
Messages
25
Points
11
Minecraft Username:
WalletNotFound

What is the suggestion about?
A simple but risky way to remove hackers (Voting)

Description:
We all know there are a lot of hackers on Jartex, but most get banned and most just use a vpn and come back. There is a risky but good way to kick any hacker or player who is doing something not allowed.
Instead of adding a report command ingame, you could add a /votekick feature that can kick a player on the scene, this feature would be effective in TheBridge because of the large amount of players in one game but can be added to other gamemodes too like Practice, by enough players voting another player off. But in TheBridge, if maybe 90% of the players vote a specific player out with their names written out to check which player voted who.
The reason for showing who a player voted is for reporting someone else for voting a "Legit or Clean" player. This can result maybe in a ban if the player actually does get kicked. This would be a nice feature to add with the amount of hackers in TheBridge but this can apply to all gamemodes.

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?
It can help kick hackers more properly from a game.
 

vortex91

Addicted Member
Joined
May 12, 2020
Messages
2,021
Points
147
IGN
UntilNightfall
No who said it has to be /wdr, and besides I already explained that it would be indeed abused by people. However, :200_iq: me (Lol cring sorry xd) though of making it a 1 time command for each game you play and the AC [anticheat] will check the player like I said and everything will be good. Also rioting and abusing the command in the chat will lead into punishment too.
No I meant on hypixel /wdr doesn’t work I was just responding to ur post; sorry if connecting the two sentences made no sense
 

bobsilowski

Donator
Donator
Joined
April 1, 2020
Messages
713
Points
92
IGN
Bobsilowski
Minecraft Username:
WalletNotFound

What is the suggestion about?
A simple but risky way to remove hackers (Voting)

Description:
We all know there are a lot of hackers on Jartex, but most get banned and most just use a vpn and come back. There is a risky but good way to kick any hacker or player who is doing something not allowed.
Instead of adding a report command ingame, you could add a /votekick feature that can kick a player on the scene, this feature would be effective in TheBridge because of the large amount of players in one game but can be added to other gamemodes too like Practice, by enough players voting another player off. But in TheBridge, if maybe 90% of the players vote a specific player out with their names written out to check which player voted who.
The reason for showing who a player voted is for reporting someone else for voting a "Legit or Clean" player. This can result maybe in a ban if the player actually does get kicked. This would be a nice feature to add with the amount of hackers in TheBridge but this can apply to all gamemodes.

How can this idea help to improve JartexNetwork?
It can help kick hackers more properly from a game.
I am for and against this. I agree with Mykkull that people will abuse this if people are toxic but at the same time, I think there needs to be some sort of flagging with staff that hackers are online Inside of the MC server.
 

_D0GG0

Donator
Donator
Joined
December 16, 2016
Messages
2,039
Points
155
Age
19
IGN
_Doggo
Neutral This would be good addition but I think people would abuse this to be toxic so do you have any ideas to prevent it from being abused?
 

Oh_myMinecraft

Donator
Donator
Joined
April 6, 2018
Messages
1,730
Points
126
I'll vote neutral as many people would abuse this command but it could be useful for sumo/brackets events
 
AUTHOR
AUTHOR
WalletNotFound
Joined
November 9, 2020
Messages
25
Points
11
Neutral This would be good addition but I think people would abuse this to be toxic so do you have any ideas to prevent it from being abused?
large amount of people voting maybe 90%, not all people are stupid maybe. And a fake vote can lead to punishment too. This would be good for large player games.
 

chocz700

Known Member
Known Member
Donator
Joined
April 21, 2020
Messages
13,437
Points
227
Suggestion - DENIED
Hello, WalletNotFound​
Thank you for your interest in JartexNetwork by creating a suggestion for the network. After reviewing your suggestion, I have decided to deny it.​
Have fun playing on JartexNetwork!​

Kind Regards,​
~ chocz700
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top