Denied Stronger evidences for inappropriate buildings and using signs/books to advertise servers and clients

[NotHixzzu_]

Minecraft Username:

NotHixzzu_​

What is your suggestion's title?

Stronger evidences for inappropriate buildings and using signs/books to advertise servers and hacked clients​

Suggestion Details:

Hello, JartexNetwork Staff Members. So I saw some people trying to build inappropriate buildings for others to get them false banned due to a personal dislike or something, but staffs think the owner built it/them and they falsely punish the owner, well the owner can also make an inappropriate building sometimes but I made this suggestion for reducing false bans. So could you guys make the evidence stronger like people have to record a video of the player building an inappropriate building or something and for advertising using signs and books make the evidence something like recording a video of the player giving you the book and for sign record a video when the player is making the sign or something well I think for a signed book you can record a video and show who signed the book then open the book and if there was an IP then ban the player, I guess. (I know you may not know what they are typing but if they were gonna place a sign record a video when they are still typing in the sign because there is a chance they might type a server IP) well if they advertised IP in chat then I think you guys can do what it is.​

Also if a player made inappropriate building(s) in someone else's plot you guys better break the inappropriate building(s) only.​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?

This can help improve JartexNetwork by reducing false bans for players. Because some people want to get people false banned due to a personal dislike​

Extra Information:

I don't think screenshots are enough for the evidences of those rule breakings in my opinion.​

 

[kaivalya]

When it comes to creative, only owners or the players who are trusted by owner can build inside the plot.
So its your responsibility to trust only your friends
if you are trusting a friend and he builds an in-app structure in plot, he may not really be your friend

 

[daviddaraban]

Suggestion - Downvoted

Hey Hixzzu!!

After reviewing your suggestion i decided to down vote it (-1) for the following reasons:
- I still dont see why a ss its not enought to punish a player that built a inapp building.

Have a nice day!

 

[Xerrainrin]

Hey NotHixzzu_,

After review your Suggestion you've sent, I'll decide Downvoted/-1 due to the following reason(s):
• firstly, like Kaivalya said, it's your responsibility to trust the player either your friend or not.

people have to record a video of the player building an inappropriate building or something and for advertising using signs and books

• secondly, in my opinion as creative main, I denied this.. because there's an option to do /2 add <playername> or /2 trust <playername> or not trust/add anyone Or remove their permission after add/trust, because it's still your responsibility for adding them and trusting them while offline either online/afk.

if a player made inappropriate building(s) in someone else's plot you guys better break the inappropriate building(s) only.

• thirdly, I have to said, they'll never learn if they do that, so that's only increase more chance finding those, if you ask How about banning, would that be enough instead clear the plot/the build? since clear and banning them, I would says neutral but overall in my point of view that's only increase the chances finding those, and why would they build if they already know that illegal, if you say they don't know the rule YET, so -1 still, learn from mistake is totally normal.

 

[toxicosis]

Hello Hixzzu,
thank you for creating a suggestion for the JartexNetwork!

After careful consideration I have decided to Downvote this suggestion for the following reasons:
- Owner's responsibility to add players to his plot

 

[TheRealCookie]

yo, a -1 on this one because it's totally the owners fault. And I really do not know what makes you think a screenshot isn't enough

 

[daviddaraban]

Minecraft Username:

NotHixzzu_​

What is your suggestion's title?

Stronger evidences for inappropriate buildings and using signs/books to advertise servers and hacked clients​

Suggestion Details:

Hello, JartexNetwork Staff Members. So I saw some people trying to build inappropriate buildings for others to get them false banned due to a personal dislike or something, but staffs think the owner built it/them and they falsely punish the owner, well the owner can also make an inappropriate building sometimes but I made this suggestion for reducing false bans. So could you guys make the evidence stronger like people have to record a video of the player building an inappropriate building or something and for advertising using signs and books make the evidence something like recording a video of the player giving you the book and for sign record a video when the player is making the sign or something well I think for a signed book you can record a video and show who signed the book then open the book and if there was an IP then ban the player, I guess. (I know you may not know what they are typing but if they were gonna place a sign record a video when they are still typing in the sign because there is a chance they might type a server IP) well if they advertised IP in chat then I think you guys can do what it is.​

Also if a player made inappropriate building(s) in someone else's plot you guys better break the inappropriate building(s) only.​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?

This can help improve JartexNetwork by reducing false bans for players. Because some people want to get people false banned due to a personal dislike​

Extra Information:

I don't think screenshots are enough for the evidences of those rule breakings in my opinion.​

There should be a way to detect who placed the respective block so they could ban only the player that placed them tbh, what yall think? Like right clicking the block while shifting shows who placed the block.

 

[iFlyYT]

Suggestion - DENIED

​

Hello, Hixzzu​

Thank you for your interest in JartexNetwork by creating a suggestion for the network. After reviewing your suggestion, I have decided to deny it for the following reason(s);​

• Whilst I understand your thoughts on this, we need absolute proof that someone other than the plot owner built the inappropriate building onto their plot. I believe I recall looking at the report you are speaking about and it's not that we think that the Plot Owner built it, its the fact that we don't have enough proof that the Plot Owner did not build it, thus why it was denied. It was enough to give suspicion but that was all.
  
  And regarding 'stronger evidence', we can't just let players get away with building inappropriate buildings just because we didn't catch them record it, afterall, the plot owner is responsible for whoever they add to their plot.
  I'm not sure what you're on about the 'Advertising via Signs and Books', I assume its similar to what was said about inappropriate buildings, the plot owner is responsible for whatever is built on their plot however if it can be proven to a guarantee that it was another user rather than the plot owner, then the user who advertised would be banned.
  
  Regarding 'Destroying whole plots', it depends on the case. If it is a massive build and the build itself is only inappropriate, we will clear the entire plot however if it's simply one tiny inappropriate building on a massive plot, we'll just break it instead.

Have fun playing on JartexNetwork!​

Kind Regards,​

~ iFlyYT​