Menu

Learn how to start playing on JartexNetwork in just 60 seconds!
Play Now
Learn how to join our server
and start playing in 60 seconds
Play Now
CLICK TO JOIN JOIN OUR DISCORD
0
0

Denied KitPvP More nicknaming features

Status
Not open for further replies.

SabitTSDM07

Donator
Donator
Joined
January 29, 2019
Messages
4,668
Points
248
Age
18
Minecraft Username:
SabitTSDM07​

What is your suggestion's title?
More nicknaming features​

Suggestion Details:
When it comes to /nick in KitPVP, there are not many features regarding it. Immortal ranked players can use color codes. So I thought of this Idea where Immortal ranked players can get more features within the nick command as it can be done pretty easily.​
The new nickname features which I want to see are:​
Multicolor​
Bold (&l)​
Italic (&0)​
Underline (&n)​
Strikethrough (&m)​
Obfuscated (&k)​
Who can access these features?​
Hero ranked players will have access to Bold and Italic. And Immortal ranked players should have access to all of them. It can also be accessed by someone who has the "Nick Command Voucher". They'll get the same nicknaming features as Hero ranked players will have.​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?
Not much. This will make nicknames look cooler and more interesting.​
 

prohero123

Donator
Donator
Joined
September 30, 2019
Messages
90
Points
14
IGN
prohero123
This could be a good suggestion as there would be more variety
 

Masri123

Addicted Member
Donator
Joined
November 12, 2020
Messages
988
Points
82
-1, i dont really agree with this suggestion. It would make chat more chaotic, along with it's useless and rather than spending time on creating features like that. Time should be spent to fix bugs that are been for a while and new updates that actually help the gameplay of KitPvP
 

JustThiemo

Lead Developer
Staff member
Developer
Donator
Joined
July 30, 2016
Messages
2,651
Points
212
Age
24
Suggestion - DENIED
Hello, SabitTSDM07​
Thank you for your interest in JartexNetwork by creating a suggestion for the network. After reviewing your suggestion, I have decided to deny it for the following reason(s);​
  • We see no value in this
Have fun playing on JartexNetwork!​

Kind Regards,​
~ JustThiemo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top