Search results for query: *

Lexireek #2

Moreover, that the false proof was requested not to be shared and he still doesn't want the rule to be scraped. Irony.

That being said, you probably want the proof to be shared?

Can be said in both ways. If rule was scraped, you wouldn't have to ask Voxl. But if it wasn't, you would have decided not to share the proof. But mostly these cases are rare to happen. It might had happened to you but nevertheless, you're successfully unbanned in few days. I cant imagine...

You missed the whole point. How do you know if it was the same player who you reported/banned? I'm not here to talk whether proof was fake or not Moreover, When you were banned, proof was requested not to be shared, otherwise you would not have faced such situation. And if this suggestion had...

Oho, how did you know if he was same guy whom you reported? More like trying to hide that you actually tried to exploit map. Edit: I just analysed everything and come to conclusion that your just lying just to make your point. Stop.

Please do not escalate the issue. Everyone has their own viewpoint and nobody can criticize someone for it. Yeah, They will not make your other reports public obviously.

I have no idea about players why they reluctant to understand about this suggestion. A normal Player can't give threats to the reporter. I have reported 250+ players and none of them have given threats to me. Please back up your argument before claiming that "there are possibility of threats". I...

The one who doesn't agree with you doesn't mean his/her decision is good or wrong.

This the only reason you can think of? Did you ever try to report anyone yet with proof shared? Nobody in this community would ever consider you as a snitch even if you keep your proof requested to be shared. Irony in your statement is that we have " Great reporter" roles which openly tells...

You are deviating from the topic. We want to remove the ability to hide the proof which actually makes booked player harder to appeal. So if that option is removed then staff will no longer override your decisions. I would like to ask you, why do you want to build anonymity while you report...

How is the accused player ever gonna harass the reporter unless he does not know him in real life? Let consider a statistic: How many proofs are requested not to be shared? Around 12% based on a random sample. Out of those 88%, how many users actually give threats to the other player? I...

But, one thing, what if the reporter removes the evidence after the ban? The thing remains pretty much the same. I'm still up with this suggestion though.

That doesn't remove your name from the video. That was some dumb statement.

What kind of threat the punished person would ever send? Unless they know each other in real life or they are friends in minecraft (who doesn't want to break the friendship)

This suggestion was buried inside. You brought it up. Hope it gets accepted now.

I agree with the statement but this should only comply with bans. Mutes, I would still want that feature for some reasons. Overall +1